Sample name: Blue Grass Army Depot

Reference: T. W. Morgan and C. L. Elliott. 2011. Comparison of remotely-triggered cameras vs. howling surveys for estimating coyote (Canis latrans) abundance in central Kentucky. Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science 72(2):84-90 [ER 3041]

Habitat: temperate broadleaf/mixed forest

Altered habitat: pasture

Protection: unprotected

Substrate: ground surface

Habitat comments: "mainly open fields and forested woodlots that range in size from 1 to 50 ha... a multiple-use military installation which incorporates grazing, hay production, silviculture, and management of wildlife resources"

Life forms: carnivores, rodents, ungulates, other small mammals, birds

Focal species: Canis latrans

Sampling methods: no design, baited, automatic cameras

Sample size: 1729 captures or sightings

Years: 2007, 2008

Net or trap nights: 3234

Camera type: digital

Cameras paired: no

Trap spacing: 1.5

Basal area status: not applicable

Sampling comments: "Ten remotely-triggered digital cameras (Game Spy 200...) were deployed from May 2007 to May 2008... cameras were placed ≥1.5 km apart to minimize the possibility of double sampling" of coyotes and "We attached cameras... approximately 40 cm above the ground... we employed the use of a scent attractant... From 9 May 2007 to 14 May 2008, a total of 3234 camera-trap nights were accumulated"
counts are of photographs, not events

Sample no: 3291

Contributor no: John Alroy

Enterer: John Alroy

Created: 2019-03-21 21:31:37

Modified: 2019-03-21 10:31:37